Övernaturligt iFokus

Övernaturligt

Etikettövrigt
Läst 1381 ggr
Skogskraft
0

Nyhittat

Once upon a time, there lived six blind men in a village. One day the villagers told them, "Hey, there is an elephant in the village today."

They had no idea what an elephant is. They decided, "Even though we would not be able to see it, let us go and feel it anyway." All of them went where the elephant was. Everyone of them touched the elephant.

"Hey, the elephant is a pillar," said the first man who touched his leg.

"Oh, no! it is like a rope," said the second man who touched the tail.

"Oh, no! it is like a thick branch of a tree," said the third man who touched the trunk of the elephant.

"It is like a big hand fan" said the fourth man who touched the ear of the elephant.

"It is like a huge wall," said the fifth man who touched the belly of the elephant.

"It is like a solid pipe," Said the sixth man who touched the tusk of the elephant.

They began to argue about the elephant and everyone of them insisted that he was right. It looked like they were getting agitated. A wise man was passing by and he saw this. He stopped and asked them, "What is the matter?" They said, "We cannot agree to what the elephant is like." Each one of them told what he thought the elephant was like. The wise man calmly explained to them, "All of you are right. The reason every one of you is telling it differently because each one of you touched the different part of the elephant. So, actually the elephant has all those features what you all said."

"Oh!" everyone said. There was no more fight. They felt happy that they were all right.

The moral of the story is that there may be some truth to what someone says. Sometimes we can see that truth and sometimes not because they may have different perspective which we may not agree too. So, rather than arguing like the blind men, we should say, "Maybe you have your reasons." This way we don't get into arguments.

[trumman]
0
#1

Oh! Idel klassiker! Den där är ju så bra :)

SEViking
0
#2

Vad har elefanter med övernaturligt att göra???

Med dessa ord ville jag bara visa att man även kan se pessimitiskt på en sens-moral-berättelse likt ovan. Mycke beror på vilken attityd VI SJÄLVA vill hålla gentemot andra och dess skrifter.

Bra text Skogskraft.

SEV Cool

mimmizenobia
0
#3

Elefanten är det övernaturliga.Vi beskriver den…..Jag beskriver min del, va…e de så du menar,Oskyldig Sev

SEViking
0
#4

Jag förstod sensmoralen, jag ville bara utöka den med att det är även humör och attityd som ger meningsskiljaktigheter.

Alltså, är man riktigt bråksugen så kan man hitta nåt å tjafsa om i vilken text som helst.

Jag tycker alltså att inlägg noll är bra, ville som sagt bara utöka den lite.

Sorry Skogskraft om du tog illa upp, vilket jag inte tror du gjort.

SEV Cool

RexPect
0
#5

#4, bara bra att sensmoralen fick ytterligare en dimension.

#0 Klok som alltid, kanske fler skulle ta del av tanken om du översatte till Svenska?  Så tar jag den Latinska varianten…(om vad den sjunde blinde KVINNAN sa)

Estne elephantus , an solum tibi libet me videre?

(Är det en Elefant, eller är du bara glad att se mej?)

Skogskraft
0
#6

#4: No problem. (Fast jag tycker iofs elefanter är väldigt andliga, på gränsen till övernaturliga, hehe.)

#5: Översätta? Orka. Men nån får mer än gärna göra det Skrattande

S(n)abla bra latinvariant, hörru Räcka ut tungan